Round Bottom Background

A theft accusation can have profound implications, affecting your freedom, reputation, and future. If you or a loved one is facing theft charges in Overland Park, KS, finding the right theft lawyer is essential. The experienced theft defense lawyers at Roth Davies LLC will help you understand theft charges in Kansas, the potential consequences, and why an experienced theft lawyer is vital to protecting your rights.

The theft lawyers at Roth Davies, LLC are dedicated to offering reliable representation and detailed legal counsel to clients that are charged with theft in Johnson County District Court or any Municipal Court in Johnson County. The theft criminal defense lawyers will fight skillfully to uphold your freedom, dispute the charges against you, and help keep your record clear.  


Hiring a skilled theft lawyer is crucial.

A conviction for theft can lead to long-term consequences that go beyond fines or incarceration. The broad categorization of theft in Kansas means a conviction can tarnish your record making it hard to find employment or pass background checks. The negative stigma associated with "theft" is far different than a marijuana possession or even a DUI. Employers can be forgiving for those types of errors, but it's difficult to justify hiring an employee with a theft conviction on their record.

Consequences of a Theft Conviction

A theft conviction on your record can affect your ability to:

  • Secure employment, as many employers hesitate to hire individuals with theft-related offenses.

  • Rent an apartment or obtain housing, as landlords may view a criminal record unfavorably.

  • Access loans or financial aid, especially for educational or business purposes.

  • Maintain professional licenses or certifications, which are often revoked following certain convictions.

  • Preserve relationships, as the stigma associated with theft can damage trust and personal connections.

By hiring an experienced theft lawyer, you gain a professional advocate who will:

Evaluate the prosecution’s evidence and identify weaknesses in the case. Sit down with you and communicate their findings and start to develop a strategic defense tailored to your unique circumstances. At the same time, your lawyer will seek out the prosecutor and try to negotiate with them to reduce or dismiss charges. If all else fails, an experienced criminal defense lawyer will represent you assertively during pre-trial negotiations and courtroom proceedings. Without a knowledgeable theft lawyer, you risk severe penalties, including incarceration, steep fines, and a tarnished reputation.


Definition of theft in Kansas

In Kansas, theft is defined as the unlawful taking or control of someone else’s property or services with the intent to permanently deprive the rightful owner of their use or benefit. Theft-related acts can include:

  1. Obtaining unauthorized control over property or services.

  2. Using deception, threats, or fraud to acquire property or services.

  3. Retaining stolen property knowingly.

Kansas law treats theft broadly, encompassing a wide range of activities. This makes it crucial to understand the specifics of the charge and how an experienced theft lawyer can tailor a defense.


Examples of theft crimes

Here are some common types of theft cases that get filed in Johnson County District Court and the surrounding municipal courts.

Shoplifting: Stealing merchandise from a store. This is by far the most common theft charge we see. All walks of life and all economic demographics are universally prone to simple shoplifting. Many of these cases are charged in the municipal courts and unless a person has several on their record are charged as misdemeanors.

Receiving stolen goods: Buying or accepting property you know is stolen. This is a far less common charge, mostly because it is more difficult to prove than a simple theft case. There are nearly always a high value cases and generally a felony charged in the Johnson County District Court.

Misusing funds: Diverting money for personal use without authorization. This is occasionally charged as theft but it's hardly ever low level. Most of the time this is an employee or a caregiver that is using their position of trust to take money from another. There are usually felony cases.

Using stolen credit cards: Fraudulent use of someone else’s payment information. This is hardly ever charged as a theft, there is a specific state law that prohibits unlawful use of a credit card. However, it can get charged as a theft if a defendant uses credit card information they lawfully obtain and then improperly use it. The most common instance is "over-tipping" by a waiter at a restaurant.

Embezzlement: Misappropriating funds from a business. This is pretty commonly charged in the district court if an employee has been taking money from an employer. It is nearly always charged a a felony just by the nature of the charge that it usually goes undiscovered for a long time. Then many small thefts become one large theft.

Each case varies in complexity, and an experienced theft lawyer can assess the evidence and develop a tailored defense strategy. There are several different types of theft and each has their own nuances to defending the case.


Theft classifications and penalties in Kansas

The classification and penalties for theft in Kansas depend on the value of the stolen property and prior convictions. Below are the two most broad classifications of theft in Kansas courts and their potential penalties. It's important to remember that there are penalties to a theft conviction aside from possible jail time including; Community service or probation, a permanent criminal record, which can affect housing and employment, loss of civil rights, such as voting or firearm ownership and difficulty accessing financial aid, scholarships, or professional licenses.


Misdemeanor theft

  • Value of property: $1,500 or less.

  • Consequences: Up to one year in jail, fines, and probation.


Felony theft

Felony theft is divided into severity levels based on the stolen property’s value:

  • Severity Level 9: $1,500–$25,000 or theft of a firearm. (Punishment ranges from 5-17 months in prison)

  • Severity Level 7: $25,000–$100,000. (Punishment ranges from 11-34 months in prison)

  • Severity Level 5: Over $100,000. (Punishment ranges from 17-46 months in prison)

Repeat offenses, thefts involving firearms, thefts as part of a common scheme, or thefts in quick succession can elevate misdemeanor theft to felony theft.


Defense strategies used by a theft lawyer

An experienced theft lawyer can employ various defenses based on your case’s unique circumstances:

  • Lack of intent: Demonstrating you did not intend to steal.

  • Mistaken identity: Arguing that you were wrongfully accused.

  • Owner’s consent: Proving you had permission to take or use the property.

  • Entrapment: Showing that law enforcement coerced you into committing the act.

  • Lack of intent to permanently deprive

  • Value in contest, Item not worth the assigned value

  • Lack of Jurisdiction

This is not an exhaustive list of defenses, your lawyer will thoroughly examine the evidence, as well as, do their own investigation to gather all the information when crafting your best defense to the case.


Steps to take if you’re charged with Theft

If you’ve been accused of theft, follow these steps to protect your rights:

  1. Remain silent: Do not speak with law enforcement without your lawyer present. This isn't the time to try to talk your way out of trouble. Many a defendant has ended up with a conviction that they wouldn't have otherwise received if they simply kept their mouth shut.

  2. Hire a theft lawyer immediately: Prompt legal representation is critical. Getting out in front of any problem is ideal, but especially when you are facing a criminal accusation of this magnitude.

  3. Collect evidence: Gather documents, receipts, or witness statements that support your case.

  4. Avoid discussing the case: Refrain from sharing details with anyone other than your lawyer. Friends and Family don't need to become a witness because you decided to tell your side of the story, only talk to your lawyer.


Qualities to look for when hiring a theft lawyer

Choosing the right theft lawyer can significantly impact the outcome of your case. Look for these qualities:

  • Experience: A strong background in theft and criminal defense cases. Now isn't the time to hire a jack of all trades lawyer, get a lawyer that focuses their practice on criminal defense in the county that you got in trouble. Look at reviews online, ask other lawyers for a referral. Ask the lawyer if they have taken a case like yours to trial and how these cases work. If you're not comfortable, then meet with another lawyer and keep looking.

  • Local expertise: Familiarity with Kansas theft laws and Johnson County courts. Ask the lawyer who the prosecutor is in your case and what they are like. If the defense lawyer can't tell you their first name and how they generally handle cases then move on to another lawyer.

  • Proven success: A track record of favorable results in theft cases. Reviews and endorsements are key here. Use your research skills and find out about your lawyer before you even hire them.

  • Clear communication: Willingness to explain legal processes and answer your questions. If your lawyer can't communicate with you then what's the point of hiring them. You have to be listened to and you have to find someone that can accurately convey information to you.


HOW DO THEFT CHARGES WORK IN JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS?

How Kansas defines theft is just like most people understand theft. You take something that does not belong to you. But there are a couple of nuances to it that most people do not get as far as on the low level of shoplifting type offenses. Most people think that as long as they never left the store or something like that that they cannot be charged with theft of the item. That is simply not true in Kansas. As long as the prosecutor can show that you concealed the item with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of that item, then they can charge you with theft. There are varying different degrees of theft as well.

Obviously it depends on the amount of money or value on which the item they say you did take. For example, anything less than $1,000, unless you have multiple thefts on your record, is going to be a Class A misdemeanor. It is going to go up from there. If it is anything over a $1,000, up to $25,000, it is going to be a level nine felony. If it goes anything from a $25 to $100, it is going to be a level seven felony. Anything over $100 is going to be a level five felony. Remember, I told you there are a lot of special rules in Kansas for drugs. There are a lot of special rules for theft as well. Some of the most common are going to be if you were in a fiduciary duty. In other words, you have a responsibility to protect someone’s money. If you are in a position of trust, like you are handling money or in the cash office.

The person has specifically put a level of trust on you, then your crime can not be elevated, but your sentence can be which is really, really common, because like let us say someone steals over $100,000, they are looking at a level five felony. Level five felony means you can go to prison for a long time. So say if you are charged with level five felony, you are looking at anywhere from thirty-one months all the way up to one hundred and thirty-six months in custody depending on your criminal history. To be able to be in a position to steal over $100,000, usually you have to be in a position of trust. Or you are a cashier or something like that. You have been entrusted with protecting this person’s money. Or you are a fiduciary.

In other words, you are their lawyer, you are their banker or something like that and you just do not have access to that much money unless you meet one of those two requirements. Well, that can double your sentence based on that. So instead of you looking at thirty-one months, you are looking at sixty-two months or one hundred and thirty-six months all the way to almost three years just based off an arbitrary special sentencing rule. There are all different varying degrees of sentences that a person gets from a theft case depending on the level of things they took and the level of or the value of the things that they took.


What happens after someone is arrested for theft in Kansas?

The most common shoplifting charge is generally when stealing from a store. Typically, an individual caught in the act of stealing will encounter some sort of interaction with a loss prevention officer. The loss prevention officer can reasonably detain you, and make you return to the store. Law enforcement will come to the store and they will attempt to interview the individual believed to of committed the theft. If the stolen property is below the value of $1,000 the officer does not have to arrest you. If you do not have a previous criminal record, are a resident of Kansas, and the stolen property is valued at less than $1000, then most often times the police officer will only issue a ticket.

The ticket will require that you appear in court on a specific date. If you are issued a ticket for a theft charge or charged with a serious theft, most people will hire an attorney. After you hire an attorney your attorney will enter an appearance for you. An attorney may be able to keep you from having to go to court. Your attorney will represent you in court, and look out for your best interest and work toward the best possible outcome for you.

A lawyer will request your police reports, videos, and anything that the city or state has as evidence against you for the charges being brought in your case. Your lawyer will have a chance to look over all the information, as well as educate you on the process involved in the case. The attorney will help guide you, and ensure the best possible outcome for their client’s case. An attorney may look at different options. The attorney can set the case for trial, or set the case for a plea, or attempt to work out some sort of diversion. Ultimately, the outcome of your case will be determined by you and your attorney.


What does the prosecution have to prove in a Theft Case?

If an individual is charged with theft, that does not mean they have been convicted of theft. Beyond a reasonable doubt is the burden of proof that the prosecution must prove. If it is a municipal offense, the municipal codes lay out what must be proven, and every element of that offense must be met beyond a reasonable doubt in order to obtain a conviction. If it is a state level charge the state statute would govern and lay out the what the prosecution has to prove. In general the city ordinance and the state statute are very similar. Here is an example of the law on theft


What are the most common types of Theft cases in Kansas?  

The most common theft cases in Kansas are shoplifting cases. A shoplifting case, for example, occurs if an individual went shopping, for instance at a mall, department store, or a grocery store, and an item is taken from that store without paying for that item. That act of stealing or shoplifting is a misdemeanor crime if the item or items total less than $1,500 in value. It is a very common occurrence for a person to be charged with shoplifting at some point in their life.


Are people who get charged with Theft always arrested? 

Not all people who are charged with theft get arrested. With most shoplifting cases, an individual will not be arrested after they commit a theft. There are exceptions, but most individuals caught shoplifting will be given a ticket or a summons to go to court on a given day. Usually that is the case if it is a first-time offense, and if the person lives or resides in Kansas. Unfortunately, if you have been caught shoplifting and you are from out of state, the police will generally make an arrest and make you post bond.


Are there different levels of severity for a Theft case?  

Shoplifting cases in Kansas can result in different levels of charges depending on the value of the items alleged to be stolen or the prior occurrences of theft by the defendant. Severity is dictated by the value, or dollar amount, of property that has been stolen. If the total amount of property stolen is valued at less than $1,000, the charge is a misdemeanor theft, is Class A misdemeanor. It is the most severe misdemeanor you can get in Kansas, whether the item was $50 or $1000 the law looks at the defendant the same.

If the value of stolen property exceeds $1,000, but is less than $25,000 dollars, then the level of charges are more severe, and an individual may be charged with a level 9 felony. A felony offense could result in jail time and fines. If you are charged with stolen property worth $25,000 to $100,000, an individual may be charged with a level 7 felony offense. A level 7 felony offense may result in jail time, as well as fines. The most severe theft charge involves stolen property valued at over $100,000, and will be a level 5 felony charge. Usually, a level 5 felony charge can result in jail time and fines.

Overall, penalties for a theft charge can be dependent on two things. One is the value, and the other is if you have a prior criminal record. If there are multiple thefts on your record, they can elevate it to a felony or if you commit multiple small thefts within seventy-two hours, an exception can be made and a felony charge can be brought as a result.


What are the potential penalties for a Theft conviction?

The potential penalties involved for a theft conviction varies depending on the severity of the crime. Severity is determined by the dollar value of stolen property and whether there is a prior record of theft. A theft charge can result in a misdemeanor or felony offense, and the severity level of the offense largely determines whether fines or jail time will result. For a misdemeanor, the worst outcome possible could be up to one year in jail. However, for a misdemeanor offense, that is pretty uncommon. If it is a felony theft, or when the value of the stolen item is $1,000, then an individual could face a lengthy jail sentence, and fines up to $100,000.

When you are trying to determine how much trouble you are in, you look at severity level of the crime, criminal history and at any aggravating or mitigating factors. Those three things will help determine how much punishment the person will be facing. If the value is $1,000 to $25,000, it is generally considered presumptive probation crime most of the time. If it is $25,000 to $100,000, most of the time those are level seven offenses, and still probation type crimes depending on someone’s criminal history. When you get to a level five theft, or stolen property valued at over $100,000 that is going to be presumptive imprisonment.

Most of the municipalities have alternative sentencing programs for first time offenders. Most municipalities in Kansas are not looking to put somebody in jail for low level theft charges, especially a shoplifting charge. However, municipalities also do not want people stealing from their business owners and want to protect the business owners in that community. For example, in Overland Park, any time you are convicted or you do a diversion for a theft charge, and get probation they are going to require that you go to an anti-theft class. That class is designed to prevent you from repeating the theft behavior in the future.

There are always different types of alternative sentencing. If you are convicted of a felony, it does not always mean that you will have to go to prison. The judge might offer probation or offer to put you in a residential center for treatment. If the crime is drug or alcohol related, a judge might let you do therapy in a treatment centers. There can be different types of alternative sentences other than just going to prison and trying to obtain one of those alternative punishments is part of what your lawyer does for you.


How can a Theft or shoplifting charge impact someone’s life?

When it comes to employment, theft is probably the worst crime you can have on your record other than child molestation or murder. Most business owners or employers who are hiring people can forgive a DUI or drug possession but are unwilling to be so forgiving with a theft conviction. Hiring managers will run background checks and a theft can be a real red flag. To avoid this lifelong red flag, most people are concerned with keeping it off their record. For a first-time theft, there is going to be ample opportunity to keep it off through a diversion process. Generally, on a first-time offense, there is a lot more of an opportunity to keep it off someone’s record. If it is multiple offenses, that is when it becomes more difficult and no diversion program will be offered.


How can a Theft charge be kept off your record?

The only way a theft charge can be kept off a criminal record, is to complete a diversion, plea to a different charge or to win a trial in court. The first option “diversion” is a bargained for agreement between your attorney and the prosecutor. The diversion process is essentially where you sign a contract. The person charged with the crime signs a contract that says “I admit that I did this theft, however I don’t normally get in trouble. I will do certain things that are required to me by the contract.” Some of those requirements will be to attend an anti-theft class, pay an amount of money, go into counseling if necessary, report to a diversion coordinator to make sure that the person is following the rules, and abstain from drug and alcohol use.

After a certain period of time, usually a year, if the person has fulfilled all their requirements under the contract, then the prosecutor will dismiss the case. Even if this does occur, it does not automatically remove it from your record completely, but it will not go on your record as a conviction. When filling out job or school applications, you can mark the box stating that you have never been convicted of a crime. However, it will be shown on your criminal record as a diversion program. In other words, if you interact with law enforcement down the road, or have some other offenses, it will be on your record for law enforcement purposes.


Are there any alternative programs for first time theft offenders?

Most of the municipalities have alternative sentencing programs for first time offenders. Most municipalities in Kansas are not looking to put somebody in jail for low level theft charges, especially a shoplifting charge. However, municipalities also do not want people stealing from their business owners and want to protect the business owners in that community. For example, in Overland Park, any time you are convicted or you do a diversion for a theft charge, and get probation they are going to require that you go to an anti-theft class. That class is designed to prevent you from repeating the theft behavior in the future.

There are always different types of alternative sentencing. If you are convicted of a felony, it does not always mean that you will have to go to prison. The judge might offer probation or offer to put you in a residential center for treatment. If the crime is drug or alcohol related, a judge might let you do therapy in a treatment centers. There can be different types of alternative sentences other than just going to prison and trying to obtain one of those alternative punishments is part of what your lawyer does for you.


What is the impact of prior theft charges on a pending Theft case?  

If you have a prior history of the same or similar criminal theft offenses, a prosecutor is going to take that into consideration when they make recommendations to the court on what happens to you. If you have multiple theft convictions within a certain amount of time, even what would be known as a misdemeanor theft, could be elevated to a felony. It just depends on your criminal history.


How does the civil portion of a Theft case work in Kansas?  

Any time you ever take anything from anyone that does not belong to you, you open yourself up to a civil case. Anyone can sue in an attempt to recover the loss of their items or stolen property. There are two mechanisms for handling theft offenses. One is through restitution, for example, if you take something from someone and it is $10,000 worth of merchandise, and you end up getting convicted of that crime, then that victim has the opportunity to ask the judge to require that you repay them for the value of the items which they lost.

The second way is a demand for payment in exchange for not seeking restitution. Essentially, it is a quick settlement. At the date they allege you stole the item, they are allowed to request that you pay a certain amount of money. If you pay that amount of money, then they cannot sue you at a later time. Usually for low level offenses this is common, there is not a huge amount money involved. So most box stores, and even most individuals, will not sue a person for that small amount of money or item stolen.


Can someone accompanying a shoplifter be charged with Theft also? 

If someone is accompanying a shoplifter, they usually will not be arrested for shoplifting, assuming it has been established that individual was actually not involved. However, it is not uncommon for a person accompanying an individual arrested for shoplifting to be caught up in the charge and have to hire a lawyer to defend themselves. It is important to keep in mind that being charged with theft, and convicted of theft, are two separate things. For an individual to be convicted of a crime, the elements of the statute or the ordinance must be proven. The prosecutor is going to have to prove that the person either had the intent to steal and permanently deprive the owner of that item.


Can a defendant claim that they "forgot to pay" or "accidentally" took an item as a defense to a Theft case?

It can be. There is caselaw that explores such a defense. State v. Taylor, 401 P.3d 632 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017).This case explored the issue of whether intent was an essential element of theft. In exploring this issue, the court held that a defendant could not be convicted of any theft unless they acted “with the intent” to permanently deprive the owner. Id. at 643.

In Kansas, intent is an essential element of theft. In order to be convicted of theft, the prosecution must be able to prove that the defendant acted with the specific intent to take another person's property without their consent and with the intention of permanently depriving them of it. This means that in order to secure a conviction for theft, the prosecution must be able to show that the defendant had the specific intent to steal the property, rather than simply taking it by accident or without realizing it. For example, if a person were to unknowingly take someone else's property, such as picking up the wrong coat by mistake, this would not be considered theft because the person did not have the necessary intent to steal the property.

It's worth noting that the specific intent to steal property can be inferred from the circumstances of the case. For example, if a person is caught with someone else's property in their possession and they cannot provide a reasonable explanation for how they came to have it, this could be taken as evidence of their intent to steal the property.


Can theft charges be expunged in Kansas?  

The simple answer is yes. If you have been charged with theft and you were convicted, it is possible to expunge the criminal record so long as you follow the expungement statute and meet the requirements.

Do you have more questions about Theft Charges? Give our office a call today for a consultation.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSE STRATEGIES UTILIZED IN THEFT CASES?

In defending theft cases, they are usually straightforward. Most people, who are charged with theft, did commit the crime. But, that does not mean that the person is going to be convicted of the crime. The defense lawyer’s obligation is to hold the prosecutor to their burden of proof. There may be defects in the prosecutor’s case that the person charged did not know about. For example, someone has to come in and say that a person committed a theft. They need to come in and say “I am the owner of that object. That person did not have the authority or permission to take that object.”

It can be difficult for the prosecutors to prove their burden of proof. Either a witness is not willing to come in, or there may not be a witness to say that it was their item. Other than making the prosecutors meet their burden of proof, you have to show that the person knowingly possessed the item. In other words, you cannot accidentally steal something.

They must show that the defendant had the intent to steal. For example, if a person just simply forgets to pay for an item or simply walks out of the store and does not realize that there was something at the bottom of their cart those people did not have the intent to steal and should not be convicted of a crime. However, there is nothing to stop them from being charged with a theft. You should never be convicted of theft, unless they can show that you intended to permanently deprive the owner of the item.

Other defenses to the theft charge is the value of the item. Someone may have committed a theft, but the value of the item is not what the prosecutors are saying it is. There are instances when an individual is charged with a felony theft because of the alleged value of the item, and it turns out that is not the correct value. There are a lot of different things you can do with theft. Each case is very fact-specific. You have to determine a lot of extraneous factors to help get the best resolution for a client.


What Do You Advise People That Want To Plead Guilty To A Theft Charge?

No one regrets hiring an attorney for advice but many regret not hiring an attorney. When someone has a lengthy criminal history and does not intend to be a productive member of our society, having a criminal record might not hurt that individual. For the other ninety-eight percent of the population, having a criminal record is a major detriment to advancing yourself within society.

Theft is a crime in which it reflects negatively on your character. There is a higher stigma associated with theft charges than that of a marijuana possession charge, a DUI charge, or things of that nature. The average person holds theft as a far more serious crime than most other crimes that are on the same level.

The crimes that have the higher stigmas attached to them are going to be the ones that impede your ability to be who you want to be. When people walk in and say “I’m just going to go plead guilty to this,” I tell them to really think about that, because now they may not be motivated to do something or may not care about having a criminal record but years from now, whenever they have changed their mindset, they are really going to wish that they would have done something different than have a theft conviction on their record.

For more information on Defense Strategies For Theft Cases, a free initial consultation is your next best step. Get the information and legal answers you are seeking by calling (913) 451-9500 today.

WHAT ARE THE DEFENSE STRATEGIES UTILIZED IN THEFT CASES?

In defending theft cases, they are usually straightforward. Most people, who are charged with theft, did commit the crime. But, that does not mean that the person is going to be convicted of the crime. The defense lawyer’s obligation is to hold the prosecutor to their burden of proof. There may be defects in the prosecutor’s case that the person charged did not know about. For example, someone has to come in and say that a person committed a theft. They need to come in and say “I am the owner of that object. That person did not have the authority or permission to take that object.”

It can be difficult for the prosecutors to prove their burden of proof. Either a witness is not willing to come in, or there may not be a witness to say that it was their item. Other than making the prosecutors meet their burden of proof, you have to show that the person knowingly possessed the item. In other words, you cannot accidentally steal something.

They must show that the defendant had the intent to steal. For example, if a person just simply forgets to pay for an item or simply walks out of the store and does not realize that there was something at the bottom of their cart those people did not have the intent to steal and should not be convicted of a crime. However, there is nothing to stop them from being charged with a theft. You should never be convicted of theft, unless they can show that you intended to permanently deprive the owner of the item.

Other defenses to the theft charge is the value of the item. Someone may have committed a theft, but the value of the item is not what the prosecutors are saying it is. There are instances when an individual is charged with a felony theft because of the alleged value of the item, and it turns out that is not the correct value. There are a lot of different things you can do with theft. Each case is very fact-specific. You have to determine a lot of extraneous factors to help get the best resolution for a client.


What Do You Advise People That Want To Plead Guilty To A Theft Charge?

No one regrets hiring an attorney for advice but many regret not hiring an attorney. When someone has a lengthy criminal history and does not intend to be a productive member of our society, having a criminal record might not hurt that individual. For the other ninety-eight percent of the population, having a criminal record is a major detriment to advancing yourself within society.

Theft is a crime in which it reflects negatively on your character. There is a higher stigma associated with theft charges than that of a marijuana possession charge, a DUI charge, or things of that nature. The average person holds theft as a far more serious crime than most other crimes that are on the same level.

The crimes that have the higher stigmas attached to them are going to be the ones that impede your ability to be who you want to be. When people walk in and say “I’m just going to go plead guilty to this,” I tell them to really think about that, because now they may not be motivated to do something or may not care about having a criminal record but years from now, whenever they have changed their mindset, they are really going to wish that they would have done something different than have a theft conviction on their record.

For more information on Defense Strategies For Theft Cases, a free initial consultation is your next best step. Get the information and legal answers you are seeking by calling (913) 451-9500 today.

WHAT IS NEEDED TO CONVICT AN INDIVIDUAL OF THEFT BY DECEPTION?

In Kansas, in order to convict an individual of theft by deception, the prosecution must be able to prove that the defendant intentionally took property from another person by means of deception. In order to prove deception, the prosecution must show that the defendant made false statements or misrepresentations in order to induce the victim to give up their property, and that the victim relied on those false statements or misrepresentations in deciding to part with their property.

For example, if a person were to sell another person a fake diamond necklace and tell the buyer that the necklace was real, this could be considered theft by deception. In order to secure a conviction, the prosecution would have to prove that the defendant knew the necklace was fake, made false statements about its authenticity in order to get the victim to buy it, and that the victim relied on those false statements in deciding to purchase the necklace.

It's worth noting that in order to be convicted of theft by deception, the defendant must have acted with the specific intent to deceive the victim. This means that the prosecution must be able to show that the defendant intended to take the victim's property through deception, rather than simply making a mistake or acting unintentionally.


What is needed to convict an individual of theft by deception? The answer comes from: State v. Saylor, 618 P.2d 1166 (Kan. 1980).

This case explored the issue of what was needed to convict an individual of theft by deception. In exploring this issue, the court held that, “In order to convict a defendant of theft by deception, the state must prove that the defendant with the required intent obtained control over another’s property by means of a false statement of representation. To do so, the state must prove that the victim was actually deceived and relied in whole or in part upon the false representation.” Id. at 1168.

In this case, a K-Mart store security officer observed the defendant as he made numerous trips through the store placing items in his shopping cart. Id. at 1167. The defendant would go to the hardware department with items in the cart but would leave the department with an empty cart. Id. at 1168. Additionally, the security officer observed the defendant take a bottle of glue to the hardware store, use it, and then return it to a counter. Id. Later on, the defendant made a small purchase and left the store. Id. After the defendant left the store, the security officer and her supervisor investigated the hardware department. Id. Upon investigation, the two found a cardboard box housing a $13.97 plastic pig toy chest which normally was located in the toy department. Id. The cover of the box had been recently resealed with glue. Id. Nevertheless, the security officer did not touch the box and the defendant came back to the store later that evening. Id. Upon arrival, the defendant went back to the hardware department, retrieved the box, and headed to the cashier. Id. Since the cashier did not expect anything was wrong, the defendant paid for the toy chest at the counter and went on his way. Id. However, the security officer was waiting outside the store and arrested the defendant. Id. Once arrested, the toy chest was opened and found inside were several chain saws, metal rules, cigarettes, heavy duty staple guns, and record albums, with a total value in excess of $500. Id. As a result, the defendant was convicted of theft by deception and appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of Kansas. Id.

On appeal, the court first examined the Kansas statute on theft by deception. Id. According to the statute, “In order to convict a defendant of theft by deception, the state must prove that the defendant with the required intent obtained control over another’s property by means of a false statement of representation. To do so, the state must prove that the victim was actually deceived and relied in whole or in part upon the false representation.” Id. In this case, the court determined that the K-Mart checkout cashier was the victim and she was completely unaware of the true contents hidden in the box. Id. at 1168-69. Furthermore, in determining that the evidence warranted a theft by deception conviction, the court noted that the act of deception and false representation did not actually occur until the defendant deceived the cashier into believing that the box contained a toy chest. Id. at 1169. Therefore, the court concluded that the trial court did not err when convicting the defendant of theft by deception. Id.

In conclusion, theft by deception requires that the defendant obtain control over another’s property by means of a false statement or representation. Id

If you are charged with theft or have more questions about how the law applies to your theft case give our office a call for a consultation.

DOES THE THEFT STATUTE REQUIRE THAT THE OWNER ACTUALLY SUFFER PERMANENT DEPRIVATION OF PROPERTY?

The simple answer is NO.

The law doesn't focus on the outcome of the defendant's actions it focuses on the intent of the defendant when they took the property. Even if the owner gets the property back, the defendant can still be convicted of theft if at the time they acted on the impulse to steal they intended to permanently deprive the owner of the item.


Does the theft statute require that the owner actually suffer permanent deprivation of property?

The answer to that question comes from: State v. Mayes, 98 P.3d 294 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).

This case explored the issue of whether the theft statute required that the owner actually suffer permanent deprivation of property. Essentially, if the owner of the property gets the property back from the defendant, should the defendant still be found guilty of theft? In exploring this issue, the court held that the theft statute required only that there be intent to permanently deprive the owner of property; it did not require that the owner actually suffer permanent deprivation of property. Id. at 300.

In this case, the theft took place by the defendant at a J.C. Penney’s department store. Id. at 296. While at the department store, the defendant drew the attention of the J.C. Penney security guard operating the security camera when the defendant stood at the entryway of the stockroom. Id. Using the security camera, the guard noticed a bulkiness in the defendant’s pants. Id. Furthermore, the security camera captured the defendant enter the sports department’s stock room and come out 8 to 9 minutes later with a Dillard’s bag. Id. At that point, the security guard pursued the defendant outside of the department store. Id. The defendant then ran back inside the store and dropped the bag inside the entrance to the store. Id. at 296-97. After examining the bag, the security guard found 47 pairs of Nike shorts and 1 pair of Nike shoes. Id. at 297. At trial, the jury found the defendant guilty of theft of property of the value of at least $500 but less than $25,000. Id As a result, the defendant was sentenced to 13 months in jail with 12 months post release supervision. Id. After being found guilty, the defendant appealed the case to the Court of Appeals of Kansas. Id.

On appeal, the defendant argued that J.C. Penney recovered all of the merchandise and, therefore, the store was not permanently deprived of possession, use, or ownership, as required by the Kansas statute on theft. Id. at 300. In addressing the defendant’s argument, the court cited past case law which held that a theft occurred when a customer in a self-service store concealed property of the store, failed to make proper payment, and left with the property concealed. Id. Additionally, the court noted that the defendant misinterpreted the Kansas statute on theft. Id. With this in mind, the court stated that the statute only required that there be intent to permanently deprive the owner of property. Id. So, the court found that the statute did not require the owner to actually suffer permanent deprivation. Id. In this case, even though the defendant immediately returned the stolen items, intent was still established by the fact that the defendant concealed the items and exited the store. Id. As a result of these facts, the court held that the defendant’s theft conviction should be upheld. Id.

In conclusion, even if a defendant immediately returns property and the owner is not technically “permanently deprived,” the fact that the defendant intended to permanently deprive the owner is all that is needed for the action to be considered theft. Id.

If you need an experienced theft defense lawyer call our office for a consultation.

CAN AN INDIVIDUAL BE GUILTY OF THEFT NOT KNOWING THAT THE PROPERTY HE OR SHE POSSESSES IS STOLEN?

In Kansas, it is not possible for an individual to be guilty of theft if they did not know that the property they possessed was stolen. Under Kansas law, a person can not be convicted of theft if they possess stolen property without knowing that the property is stolen.

For example, if a person buys a stolen laptop from someone without realizing that it is stolen, and then takes possession of the laptop with the intention of keeping it, they should not be charged with theft. They could only be charged with theft if they continued to maintain possession of the property after they discovered that it was stolen. The prosecution would be required to prove that the defendant had actual knowledge that the property was stolen in order to secure a conviction.


Can an individual be guilty of theft not knowing that the property he or she possesses is stolen?

The answer to this question can be found by reading: State v. Taylor, 401 P.3d 632 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017).

This case explored the issue of whether an individual could be found guilty of theft not knowing that the property he or she possessed was stolen. In exploring this issue, the court held that a defendant who has no knowledge that the property he or she possessed was stolen could never intend to permanently deprive the actual owner of the property. Id. at 644. Therefore, a defendant in that situation would not be guilty of theft. Id.

In this case, a police officer responded to a car accident in which there was a single overturned car. Id. at 638. Once the officer arrived on the scene, the defendant identified himself as the driver of the overturned car. Id. After running the defendant’s name, the officer learned that the defendant was driving on an expired license and arrested him. Id. Following the arrest, the officer searched the defendant’s car and found a handgun that had been reported stolen. Id. As a result, the defendant was charged with theft—meaning the defendant had obtained or exerted unauthorized control over the handgun with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of possession of the handgun. Id. During trial, the prosecuting attorney asserted that the State (plaintiff) had no burden to prove that the defendant knew that the handgun was stolen. After trial, the defendant was convicted of theft. Id. at 639-40.

On appeal, the defendant argued that there was not enough evidence to convict him of theft. Id. In addressing the argument, the Court of Appeals of Kansas first noted that every theft offense, without exception, required that the defendant know they had somehow gained control over stolen property. Id. at 643. Furthermore, the court went on to describe three different stolen property scenarios: (1) defendants actively engaged in stealing the property, (2) thefts involving defendants who had passively received stolen property know it was stolen by another, and (3) defendants who had no knowledge the property was stolen. Id. at 643-44. According to the court, the defendants who were actively engaged in stealing the property would have the necessary guilty mindset to commit a theft because the act of taking the property from the owner established that it was their intent to deprive the owner of the possession, use, or benefit of the property. Id. Additionally, the court stated that the defendant who knowingly received stolen property also had the necessary guilty mindset to commit a theft because the act of receiving the property that they knew was stolen meant they also intended to permanently deprive the rightful owner of the property. Id. at 644. However, the court concluded that defendants who had no knowledge that the property they possessed was stolen could never intend to permanently deprive the actual owner of the property because those defendants would believe that they were the actual owners of the property. Id.

In conclusion, the court determined that the defendant did not know the handgun was stolen; therefore, he should not have been found guilty of theft. Id.

If you need help with a theft case call the experienced criminal defense lawyers at Roth Davies, LLC for a consultation.

DOES THE PROPERTY NEED TO BE CARRIED AWAY OR TAKEN SOME MEASURABLE DISTANCE TO BE CONSIDERED THEFT?

In Kansas, it is not necessary for the property to be carried away or taken a measurable distance in order for an act to be considered theft. Under Kansas law, the act of taking another person's property without their consent and with the intention of permanently depriving them of it is sufficient to constitute theft, regardless of whether the property is moved or not.

For example, if a person were to take someone else's wallet and then immediately return it, this would still be considered theft because the person took the property without the owner's consent and with the intention of permanently depriving them of it, even though the property was not carried away or taken a measurable distance.

It's worth noting that the specific requirements for a theft conviction will vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. In some cases, the movement of the property may be an important factor in determining whether an act constitutes theft or not. However, in general, the act of taking another person's property without their consent and with the intention of permanently depriving them of it is sufficient to constitute theft, regardless of whether the property is moved or not.


Does the property need to be carried away or taken some measurable distance to be considered theft?

The answer to that question is found by reading: State v. Plummer, 251 P.3d 102 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).

This case explored the issue of whether property needed to be carried away or taken some measurable distance to be considered theft. In exploring this issue, the court held that theft did not require the defendant to move the property to complete the offense. Id. at 107.

In this case, the defendant entered a Target and immediately attracted the attention of the security guards because he seemed fidgety. Id. at 105. Over the course of two hours, the defendant walked throughout the store under the observation of several security cameras. Id. Initially, the defendant picked up a pair of sunglasses and put them in his pocket. Id. Later on, the defendant took a backpack, removed the paper packaging from inside, and began to fill it with a variety of Target merchandise. Id. Additionally, the defendant took a Target knife to cut the packaging from a shaver that he put in the backpack. Id. Eventually, the defendant pushed a shopping cart with the backpack in it toward the store exit. Id. After grabbing the backpack and moving past the registers, the defendant entered a set of double doors leading outside. Id. At the same time, a Target security guard pursued the defendant and grabbed his arm and told him to stop. Id. The defendant then punched the security guard and the two began to quarrel until police arrived on the scene. Id. After searching the defendant, the police discovered over $300 worth of Target merchandise from his pockets and backpack. Id. At trial, the defendant requested that the court instruct the jury on theft and robbery as lesser offenses. Id. However, the judge declined to give an instruction for theft and the jury found the defendant guilty of aggravated robbery. Id. The defendant appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals of Kansas. Id.

In addressing the defendant’s argument, the court noted that the crime of theft did not require the defendant to move the property to complete the offense. Id. at 107. Furthermore, the court determined that theft was completed once the defendant exercised dominion or control over the property. Id. According to the court, the property did not need to be carried away or taken some measurable distance. Id. In making these statements, the court cited a Supreme Court of Kansas case which held, “Where a customer in a self-service store conceals on his person . . . property of the store and has the requisite specific criminal intent, that customer has committed a theft.” Id. In other words, no matter how far away an individual takes the property from the owner, if the individual has the intent to exercise dominion over the property, a theft has occurred. Id.

In conclusion, the property does not need to be carried away or taken some measurable distance to be considered theft. Id.

If you need the help of an experienced theft defense lawyer give our office a call for consolation today.

HAS A THEFT OCCURRED IF YOU TAKE SOMETHING FROM A PERSON THAT DOES NOT HAVE THE MENTAL CAPACITY TO GIVE IT AND YOU KNOW THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE THE MENTAL CAPACITY TO GIVE IT?

Sometimes the black letter law passed by the legislature is unclear. The legislature can’t anticipate every possible fact scenario when they pass a law, so it lay to the courts to interpret the law and give guidance to what it means. This interpretation is called case law. When the court decides a certain meeting to the law it essentially answers a legal question. Lawyers and other courts then can rely on that ruling when they have a similar issue in their case. The following case answers the question above.

State v. Maxon, 79 P.3d 202 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).

This case addresses the following issue:

Should a defendant who receives a gift from an individual be found guilty of theft if the defendant knows the individual lacks the mental capacity to consent to giving the gift?

This case explored the issue of whether a defendant who received a gift from an individual could be convicted of theft because the defendant knew the individual giving the gift lacked the consent to do so. In exploring this issue, the court held that a defendant could not be convicted of theft in this situation because it was not what the Kansas lawmakers intended the theft statute to encompass. Id. at 210.

In this case, the victim was a recent widow and had substantial assets valued in the millions of dollars. Id. at 204-05. Shortly after her husband’s death, the victim befriended a family who had done business with her husband in the past (the defendants are two members of this family). Id. at 205. Shortly after the victim befriended the family, the defendant began writing checks to and purchasing property for the defendants. Id. With this said, the specific theft charges in this case involved: (1) the sale of the victim’s house to the defendants; and (2) the defendants purchase of a new truck. Id. The victim sold her house to the defendants for well below asking price and the victim bought a $39,000 new pickup truck for the defendants. Id. Eventually, the victim severed her relationship with the defendants after she gave them both $25,000 checks for Christmas and they did not give her anything in return. Id. Around this time, the victim reconciled her relationship with her son, and he began to look into her financial affairs. Id. Additionally, the victim was diagnosed with several mental disorders which led her to be vulnerable to the influence of others. Id. at 206. Subsequently, the victim filed a lawsuit against the defendants and they were convicted of two counts of theft and one count of mistreatment of a dependent adult. Id. at 204. In response, the defendants appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals of Kansas. Id. at 206.

According to the trial court, the stolen property included the house and the $39,000 in connection with the pickup truck. Id. at 209. Additionally, the trial court held that the defendants were guilty of theft because they “obtained or exerted unauthorized control over property.” Id. On appeal, the defendants argued that they were not guilty of theft because they obtained control over the property with the victim’s permission. Id. In responding to the defendants’ arguments, the Court of Appeals of Kansas had to determine whether “obtaining or exerting unauthorized control over property” encompassed doing so with the consent of the original owner. Id. In addressing this point, the court noted that the State (plaintiff) wanted the court to create a definition of “unauthorized control” that included a consensual transfer from a donor who lacked mental capacity. Id. Essentially, the State wanted an individual to be found guilty of theft if they took advantage of a person who lacked the mental capacity to voluntarily give a gift. Id. In the end, the court determined that they needed to determine what the lawmakers were intending when they wrote the statute for theft. Id. at 210. In considering these intentions, the court held that the lawmakers did not intend for this type of situation to be considered theft. Id. According to the court, the lawmakers would not have created a statute for mistreatment of a dependent adult had they wanted this type of situation to be considered theft. Id.

In conclusion, the court held that the defendants were guilty of mistreatment of a dependent adult but not guilty of theft. Id. at 211.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ROBBERY AND THEFT?

In Kansas, robbery is a crime that involves the taking of another person's property through the use of force or fear. This means that in order for an act to be considered robbery, the person committing the crime must use or threaten violence in order to take the property.

Theft, on the other hand, is the act of taking another person's property without their consent and with the intention of permanently depriving them of it. Theft can be committed in a variety of ways, such as pickpocketing, shoplifting, and embezzlement. Unlike robbery, theft does not involve the use of force or threats of violence. Both robbery and theft are serious crimes and can result in significant penalties, including jail time and fines. However, robbery is typically considered a more serious offense because it involves the use of force or threats of violence.


What is the difference between robbery and theft?

The answer comes from: Kansas v. Bateson, 970 P.2d 1000 (Kan. 1998).

This case explored the difference between robbery and theft. In exploring the difference, the court held that robbery involved an offender taking property from another by force or by threat of bodily harm and theft did not involve any type of force or threat. Id. at 1001.

In this case, the victim was alone in her work office. Id. After leaving briefly to get some information from an adjoining office, she returned to observe the defendant bent over behind her desk. Id. She then asked what he was doing and he replied, “looking for somebody.” Id. The victim then saw that her lower desk drawer where she kept her purse was partially opened. Id. Upon looking inside her purse, the victim noticed that $95 in cash was missing as well as her address book. Id. Once the victim saw the missing money, she demanded the defendant give it back. Id. The defendant then turned, left the office, and walked rapidly to the stairs (never threatening or applying force to the victim). Id. After the defendant fled, the victim followed him, some 6 to 8 feet behind. Id. In order to get out of the building, the defendant had to go through several doors. Id. While the victim was following the defendant, one of the doors slammed in her face. Id. Eventually, the defendant was apprehended and found guilty by a jury of robbery. Id. As a result, the defendant appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of Kansas. Id.

On appeal the defendant argued that the court should have convicted him of theft instead of robbery. Id. According to the defendant, he did not take the property by force or threat. Id. Contrary to the defendant’s opinion, the State (plaintiff) argued that the defendant used force (slamming the door) to effect the removal of the property from the victim’s presence and the office building. Id.

In responding to the defendant’s argument, the court first examined the Kansas statutes on robbery and theft. Id. The robbery statute stated, “Robbery is the taking of property from the person or presence of another by force or by threat of bodily harm to any person.” Id. Additionally, the theft statute stated, “Theft is any of the following acts done with intent to deprive the owner permanently of the possession, use or benefit of the owner’s property: (1) Obtaining or exerting unauthorized control over property.” Id. After examining the two statutes, the court determined that the defendant’s use of force did not come before nor was it at the same time with the taking of the cash and address book. Id. at 1005. Furthermore, the court noted that the defendant had control of the property when he left the victim’s office. Id. Also, the court found that the defendant was out of the victim’s sight at the time of the door slamming incident and the taking was complete before the force occurred. Id. Therefore, the court held that the evidence supported a theft conviction and not a robbery conviction. Id.

If you need a lawyer for theft or have questions about the law on theft, call our office for a free consultation.

Get In Touch With Us!